Amelia Chan

violinist | Creator, First Principles Violin

Amelia Chan is currently concertmaster of the City Chamber Orchestra of Hong Kong (CCOHK).

She came to this position from her tenure as concertmaster of the West Virginia Symphony Orchestra (US). An experienced leader, Amelia has served in the concertmaster chair under acclaimed conductors such as Sir Neville Marriner, Michael Tilson Thomas, Manfred Huss, Sergiu Commissiona, Anton Coppola, Zdeněk Mácal, Jorge Mester, Julius Rudel, and Gerard Schwarz. She has also performed with the New York Philharmonic extensively. As a chamber musician, Amelia has served as first violinist of the Montclaire String Quartet, and has collaborated with guitarist Sharon Isbin, accordionist Richard Galliano, violinist Lara St. John, the Ying Quartet, members of the Vienna Philharmonic Orchestra, and the Jupiter Symphony Chamber Players (NYC), among others. She has appeared as soloist with orchestras including the West Virginia Symphony, the International Virtuosi Orchestra on tour in Central America, the New Amsterdam Symphony Orchestra (NYC), the Brooklyn Symphony Orchestra (NYC), and the City Chamber Orchestra of Hong Kong. She has shared the stage as co-soloist with acclaimed flutist Sir James Galway, and frequently acts as director for the City Chamber Orchestra. She has performed at the Costa Rica Music Festival, the Guatemala Music Festival, Cooperstown Chamber Music Festival in New York and the Pacific Music Festival (Japan).

Amelia has been heard on WQXR, New York; WQED, Pittsburgh; West Virginia Public Broadcasting; BBC Radio Scotland, Scotland; and RTHK Radio 4, Hong Kong.

As an educator, Amelia approaches the teaching of technique through the lens of whole-body biomechanics, and on the principle that techniques of playing an instrument need to be relational to the body, and to how it moves, instead of relying on a static one-size-fits-all method. She believes in a focused and deep education that goes beyond rote training, where the student learns discernment and critical thinking, while sifting through the layers of intellect needed to decipher the depths of the musical art, to get to the natural, joyful simplicity of music-making.

Amelia holds undergraduate, graduate, and post-graduate degrees from the Mannes College of Music and Manhattan School of Music (NY). She began her violin studies in the junior school at the Hong Kong Academy for Performing Arts. Her major teachers included Thomas Wang, Alice Waten, Albert Markov, Shirley Givens, Lisa Kim, Yoko Takebe, Sheryl Staples, Glenn Dicterow, and double-bassist Julius Levine.

For more information on Amelia, please go to her Instagram page at https://www.instagram.com/ameliachanviolin/ 

——————————————————————————-

"Concertmaster Amelia Chan in particular played with passion, acting as the vibrant soul of the ensemble.” South China Morning Post 

“…gutsy solo violin throughout [by] concertmaster Amelia Chan…” theprickle.org

The Fallacy of "Relax"

For string players, few instructions are more common than "relax." While there are times when one needs to be aware of where excessive tension lies, the cue to relax can do more harm than good. The instinctive reaction to this word usually produces at worst something close to a wet noodle, and at best a haphazard effort to disengage different parts chaotically — rather than the active, cohesive engagement that we need for all the parts to work as one.

On a purely psychological level: to relax while executing a complicated craft that requires such intense concentration and physical precision is an oxymoron. Add performance nerves on top — how can a nervous system reconcile the two?

While I don't necessarily agree that musicians are "small-muscle athletes," the analogy does expose the fallacy of "relaxation" as well. No one would ever tell an athlete to relax on the field. How would it make sense for us?

I recently saw a post from a very good violinist — a video of himself playing, demonstrating that he doesn't "hold" the violin with his thumb, but rather "caresses" it. Yes, he's clearly not gripping with the distal end of his thumb, but he is just as clearly moving efficiently from the base joint, thus utilizing the whole thumb and strongly engaging its pad, which in turn connects all his fingers with the arches of the hand, and the hand to the arm. All this is why his thumb can be light and look as if it's simply caressing the instrument. But only trying to relax the thumb will never get one to do what he can do.

This is the kind of instruction, passed down for generations, that does real damage: a great, natural player does something instinctively well, communicates what he *thinks* he's doing — and it is factually not what he's doing. The string world is full of instructions like this. Two more examples come to mind. A violinist and teacher as great as Aaron Rosand: I've seen footage of him in a masterclass demonstrating how one should hold the violin high — and the next shot shows Mr. Rosand playing with his violin at exactly the height he had just dismissed as too low. Another contemporary violinist talks about the importance of a "straight" bow when playing spiccato. He demonstrates with a single-note spiccato and gives two versions — one with a straight bow, one with a not-so-straight bow. First, I think his less-straight-bow spiccato actually sounds better! The tone is more resonant and there's more control. Then, three seconds later, he demonstrates with an actual musical passage, brilliantly — and while it's subtle, it's not the "straight" bow version he had just demonstrated at all.

So many well-trained players get used to repeating the same dogma, not even aware that they do not play the way they think they're playing.

This is why working from first principles matters. The internet and AI age gives us the benefit of so much information — but one must filter it with first-principles discernment. And part of that discernment means questioning preconceived notions and investigating anything we don't actually understand. Take the bow thumb: one of my teachers, Glenn Dicterow, used to say that he thought it was impossible for the bow thumb to always stay bent — he had dismissed this dogma through his own experience. But more often than not, what one hears is the mantra "the thumb must be bent," over and over again.

Going back to the left-hand thumb — and by extension, to every part of the body cued to "relax": as a point of entry to technical puzzles, it is far more efficient to understand and learn how to properly engage the body for the motion we need, rather than trying to vaguely "relax." After all, what creates unnecessary tension is usually compensation for something else in the body that should be working but isn't. When the right parts are finally able to work properly, the unnecessary bits actually have a chance to let go, because they no longer need to take up a responsibility that was never theirs. Seen this way, letting go of tension is no longer "relaxing," but a far more organized form of release.